fix C-0211 sysctls fixpath #580

YiscahLevySilas1 · 2024-02-18T11:07:40Z

User description

Overview

This PR fixes the suggested fix of the sysctls section in the security context.
Important note - this fix is a place holder meant to prompt users to fill this section with values that are relevant for their application. K8s will not allow applying it as is because the key name is capital letters, this is good as it will force users to fill in meaningful values.

Resolves issue

Type

enhancement

Description

Enhanced sysctls configuration placeholders in security context checks to prompt users with "YOUR_VALUE" for customization.
Updated expected test outputs to align with the new placeholder approach for Pods, Workloads, and CronJobs.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files

Enhancement

raw.rego `Enhance sysctls Configuration Placeholders` rules/set-sysctls-params/raw.rego Updated fixPaths to prompt users with "YOUR_VALUE" placeholders for both name and value in sysctls configurations. Applied changes across Pod, Workload, and CronJob securityContext checks.	+9/-3

Tests

expected.json `Update Expected Test Output for CronJob sysctls Configuration` rules/set-sysctls-params/test/cronjob/expected.json Modified expected test output to match new "YOUR_VALUE" placeholders in sysctls configurations for CronJobs.	+27/-18
expected.json `Update Expected Test Output for Pod sysctls Configuration` rules/set-sysctls-params/test/pod/expected.json Updated expected test output to include "YOUR_VALUE" placeholders for sysctls configurations in Pods.	+26/-18
expected.json `Update Expected Test Output for Workload sysctls Configuration` rules/set-sysctls-params/test/workload/expected.json Adjusted expected test output to reflect "YOUR_VALUE" placeholders in sysctls configurations for Workloads.	+30/-21

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The describe tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a description for the PR - title, type, summary, walkthrough and labels. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

When commenting, to edit configurations related to the describe tool (pr_description section), use the following template:

/describe --pr_description.some_config1=... --pr_description.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_description]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the describe tool is: `pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.add_original_user_description=true" "--pr_description.keep_original_user_title=true", ...]` meaning the `describe` tool will run automatically on every PR, will keep the original title, and will add the original user description above the generated description. Markers are an alternative way to control the generated description, to give maximal control to the user. If you set: `pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.use_description_markers=true", ...]` the tool will replace every marker of the form `pr_agent:marker_name` in the PR description with the relevant content, where `marker_name` is one of the following: `type`: the PR type. `summary`: the PR summary. `walkthrough`: the PR walkthrough. Note that when markers are enabled, if the original PR description does not contain any markers, the tool will not alter the description at all.
Custom labels The default labels of the `describe` tool are quite generic: [`Bug fix`, `Tests`, `Enhancement`, `Documentation`, `Other`]. If you specify custom labels in the repo's labels page or via configuration file, you can get tailored labels for your use cases. Examples for custom labels: `Main topic:performance` - pr_agent:The main topic of this PR is performance `New endpoint` - pr_agent:A new endpoint was added in this PR `SQL query` - pr_agent:A new SQL query was added in this PR `Dockerfile changes` - pr_agent:The PR contains changes in the Dockerfile ... The list above is eclectic, and aims to give an idea of different possibilities. Define custom labels that are relevant for your repo and use cases. Note that Labels are not mutually exclusive, so you can add multiple label categories. Make sure to provide proper title, and a detailed and well-phrased description for each label, so the tool will know when to suggest it.
Inline File Walkthrough 💎 For enhanced user experience, the `describe` tool can add file summaries directly to the "Files changed" tab in the PR page. This will enable you to quickly understand the changes in each file, while reviewing the code changes (diffs). To enable inline file summary, set `pr_description.inline_file_summary` in the configuration file, possible values are: `'table'`: File changes walkthrough table will be displayed on the top of the "Files changed" tab, in addition to the "Conversation" tab. `true`: A collapsable file comment with changes title and a changes summary for each file in the PR. `false` (default): File changes walkthrough will be added only to the "Conversation" tab.
Utilizing extra instructions The `describe` tool can be configured with extra instructions, to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Notice that the general structure of the description is fixed, and cannot be changed. Extra instructions can change the content or style of each sub-section of the PR description. Examples for extra instructions: `[pr_description] extra_instructions=""" - The PR title should be in the format: '<PR type>: <title>' - The title should be short and concise (up to 10 words) - ... """` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the describe usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <yiscahls@armosec.io>

codiumai-pr-agent-free · 2024-02-18T11:08:14Z

PR Description updated to latest commit (59c4730)

codiumai-pr-agent-free · 2024-02-18T11:08:29Z

PR Review

PR feedback
⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and localized to specific sections of the code, focusing on enhancing sysctls configuration placeholders. The modifications are consistent across different Kubernetes objects (Pods, Workloads, and CronJobs), which simplifies the review process.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
🔍 Possible issues	The placeholder "YOUR_VALUE" might not be clear enough for all users. It could be beneficial to include a comment or documentation link explaining how to choose appropriate values for their context. There's no validation to ensure that users replace "YOUR_VALUE" with actual, sensible values. This could lead to configurations that are not properly set up.
🔒 Security concerns	No

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: `[pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the `review` tool is: `pr_commands = ["/review", ...]` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations
Auto-labels The `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible security issues (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag)
Extra sub-tools The `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, and more.
Auto-approve PRs By invoking: `/review auto_approve` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: `[pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: `[pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5`
More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

codiumai-pr-agent-free · 2024-02-18T11:08:32Z

PR Code Suggestions

Suggestions

enhancement

Use more descriptive placeholders for fixPaths values.

Consider using a more descriptive placeholder than "YOUR_VALUE" for the fixPaths entries.
This will help users understand what kind of value is expected.

rules/set-sysctls-params/raw.rego [15-16]

-fixPaths := [{"path": sprintf("%s.name", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"},
-             {"path": sprintf("%s.value", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"}]
+fixPaths := [{"path": sprintf("%s.name", [path]), "value": "<expected_sysctl_name>"},
+             {"path": sprintf("%s.value", [path]), "value": "<expected_value>"}]

Add validation for fixPaths values to ensure they meet expected criteria.

Consider adding validation logic to ensure that the fixPaths values are not only present
but also adhere to expected formats or ranges.

rules/set-sysctls-params/raw.rego [15-16]

-fixPaths := [{"path": sprintf("%s.name", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"},
-             {"path": sprintf("%s.value", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"}]
+# Example validation logic for fixPaths (pseudocode)
+validateFixPaths(fixPaths) {
+    all fixPath in fixPaths {
+        # Validate fixPath.value according to expected format or range
+    }
+}

maintainability

Improve the readability by aligning the indentation.

Align the indentation of the fixPaths array elements for better readability.

rules/set-sysctls-params/raw.rego [15-16]

-fixPaths := [{"path": sprintf("%s.name", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"},
-             {"path": sprintf("%s.value", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"}]
+fixPaths := [
+    {"path": sprintf("%s.name", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"},
+    {"path": sprintf("%s.value", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"}
+]

Refactor fixPaths creation to a separate function for better organization.

Refactor the creation of fixPaths to a separate function for better code organization and
reusability.

rules/set-sysctls-params/raw.rego [15-16]

-fixPaths := [{"path": sprintf("%s.name", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"},
-             {"path": sprintf("%s.value", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"}]
+generateFixPaths(path) = fixPaths {
+    fixPaths := [
+        {"path": sprintf("%s.name", [path]), "value": "<expected_sysctl_name>"},
+        {"path": sprintf("%s.value", [path]), "value": "<expected_value>"}
+    ]
+}

possible issue

Ensure fixPaths entries are unique to prevent overwrites.

Ensure that the fixPaths array does not inadvertently overwrite each other by specifying
unique paths or values where necessary.

rules/set-sysctls-params/raw.rego [15-16]

-fixPaths := [{"path": sprintf("%s.name", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"},
-             {"path": sprintf("%s.value", [path]), "value": "YOUR_VALUE"}]
+fixPaths := [{"path": sprintf("%s.name", [path]), "value": "<unique_name>"},
+             {"path": sprintf("%s.value", [path]), "value": "<unique_value>"}]

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is: `pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]` meaning the `improve` tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.
Utilizing extra instructions Extra instructions are very important for the `improve` tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: `[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
A note on code suggestions quality While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

github-actions · 2024-02-18T11:22:24Z

Summary:

License scan: failure
Credentials scan: failure
Vulnerabilities scan: failure
Unit test: success
Go linting: success

YiscahLevySilas1 and others added 2 commits February 18, 2024 13:01

fix fixpath

59c4730

Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <yiscahls@armosec.io>

Merge branch 'master' into C-0211-fix

65343a8

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 18, 2024

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the Review effort [1-5]: 2 label Feb 18, 2024

kooomix approved these changes Feb 18, 2024

View reviewed changes

YiscahLevySilas1 merged commit 76b5600 into master Feb 18, 2024
24 checks passed

YiscahLevySilas1 deleted the C-0211-fix branch April 14, 2024 10:46

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

fix C-0211 sysctls fixpath #580

fix C-0211 sysctls fixpath #580

YiscahLevySilas1 commented Feb 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 18, 2024

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 18, 2024

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Feb 18, 2024

fix C-0211 sysctls fixpath #580

fix C-0211 sysctls fixpath #580

Conversation

YiscahLevySilas1 commented Feb 18, 2024 • edited Loading

User description

Overview

Type

Description

Changes walkthrough

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 18, 2024

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 18, 2024

PR Review

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 18, 2024 • edited Loading

PR Code Suggestions

github-actions bot commented Feb 18, 2024

YiscahLevySilas1 commented Feb 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading